HUD-L-4760-25 24-04-2026
פרקים
-
1:04פרק 1: This is the matter of Uwasawa. 97s · Speaker 1
This is the matter of Uwasawa. Uwasawa versus Hoboken Planning Board on Road Properties, Hoboken Care, L .I .C., L .A. Moore, PDL 476 -25. Plaintiff, please, your parents. Okay. And you, ma 'am, are? Oh, yes. Okay. Great, thank you. And you…
-
2:42פרק 2: sir. I'll hear you. 137s · Speaker 2
sir. I'll hear you. I've read the papers. Thank you, Your Honor. Very simply, this motion comes down to two concrete points. One, there does exist and was represented to the planning board of the Sviva Book, and that an agreement exists bet…
-
5:00
that the plaintiffs here either made their arguments or were considered by the board, don't they have a right to bring an action in lieu of prerogative rights? Don't they have a right to do that? There's no doubt that they have a right to f…
-
10:02
Yeah, I think basically the New Jersey Construction Court, it is required by the New Jersey Construction Court that this low impact of driving, its monitoring with the self -limit, it's already mandated by the construction court, by the New…
-
14:12פרק 5: sir, let me just, but there's something, this agreement between the Doric and the city. 302s · Speaker 2
sir, let me just, but there's something, this agreement between the Doric and the city. planning board, the DORC board, don't they speak for the residents? So how, so you're not happy with their decision? Actually, Your Honor, actually we a…
-
19:15פרק 6: or that you shouldn't get mugged on the subway. 302s · Speaker 1
or that you shouldn't get mugged on the subway. So I don't know what that means either, sir. Okay. So basically, to narrow down, it's really the context of the structure of the Doric, because Doric could be adversely more damaged because of…
-
24:17
the methodology on agreement, which we are informed about in general part. two weeks later, and the detail, we didn't get it until two months later, because the conversation was dry first, we didn't get, we are not notified about the conten…
-
28:30פרק 8: thank you. 304s · Speaker 2
thank you. Ma 'am, did you have anything you wanted to say? Okay, all right. She's there. I want them to be kind and ask the question. Any rebuttal? our board professionals, the developers' professionals, the objectors, the public participa…
-
33:35פרק 9: and the developer. 300s · Speaker 1
and the developer. Moreover, none of them raised studies or analysis of types of decision -making. In Office 1225, after hearing closing arguments from Council, the board voted to approve the application, subject to certain conditions, incl…
-
38:36
It is a creature of statute with affirmative duty to protect the public. The Board, however, is required to memorialize only the testimony before it and is constrained to the information provided before it in reaching its decision, NJSA 405…